Showing posts with label shirk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shirk. Show all posts

Friday, 2 September 2011

Justice In Islam.



From Principle to Practice: Justice in Islam

By Shaykh Mohammed Amin Kholwadia 

People often question whether Islam is a tolerant religion, whether it tolerates diversity of thought among its adherents and in its interaction with different worldviews.  This question is easily answered when one considers that Allah created diversity, it is an expression of His ultimate creative power; He is the Ultimate Creator.  This fact must be brought to the foreground.

Universal application of Allah’s Lordship
All worlds and all things are under the sovereignty of Allah; even the devil is under His Lordship.  The mere fact that He has created something (even the Devil) gives a sense of His lordship over everything.  Of course, there are levels of Mercy – but we must acknowledge the Universal Mercy of Allah through which everything exists.  For this, perspective is essential in understanding Islam.
Medieval painters believed that if you had a scene with mountains in the distance and a house in front of you, the mountains should be drawn very large and the house very small, in order to accurately depict their absolute sizes.  It was only when they discovered that perspective in painting did not minimize reality, that perspective was measured according to the focal point of the painting.  Then, they began painting the house larger and the mountains smaller in the background.  (Muslim painters did not adopt the use of perspective until later still).
Likewise in Islam, there is a background or backdrop and a perspective or focal point.  Allah’s universal lordship is the background and Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the perspective.  Without Muhammad (pbuh), there is no perspective with which to understand and practice Islam.  However, the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) must also be understood against the backdrop of Allah’s universal lordship.  In this picture of Islam, the two cannot be separated.  The truths in Islam can be understood in the light of these two principles.  Applying them outside of this would be to take them out of context (perspective).
In the animals and plants, even in the dirt and soil, He created diversity (Surah Al-Fatir).  When He created such diversity in plants and animals, it is not surprising to see that it exists in humans. His lordship is over all this.  In Surah an-Nas, the final chapter of the Qur’an, Allah states that He is the Lord of all mankind.  In the time of the Prophet (pbuh), the disbelievers (kafirs) of Makkah said that they owned their gods; Muhammad (pbuh) taught them that no one owns God, He owns all.  Everything you see in Islam must be in front of this backdrop.  Accept Allah as He is, not as you want Him to be.
There are some universal truths about human beings.  These truths must be appreciated by Muslims if they are to engage in dialogue with others.  For example, Allah tells us that man is created from haste.  We all want quick and instant results all the time.  This is haste.
Also, when Allah created humans, angels predicted humans would cause corruption and bloodshed.  Allah did not deny them this observation, but responded by telling them, “I know that which you do not.”  All humans, Muslims and non-Muslims, have proven the angels to be absolutely correct in their observations.  The truth is that all humans can and do fall below expected human standards and hence, the corruption and bloodshed.  When someone falls below such standards, the actions they commit are not reflective of any faith, but of their failure to maintain those human standards.  No religion has been or is immune from breeding humans who judge people in haste and who have no second thoughts about bloodshed.  This is the saga of humans – religious or otherwise.
It is essential for Muslims to introduce Muhammad (pbuh) into the American picture.  It is only through Muhammad (pbuh) that we know Allah and the other prophets (peace be upon them all).  One of his (pbuh) primary duties was to establish justice, in accordance with Divine revelation, in the spiritual and interpersonal dimensions of our lives. In the spiritual realm, he (pbuh) came to show the universal application of Allah’s lordship, to eliminate shirk (associating partners with Allah) because shirk is injustice, and to replace it with tawheed or awareness of Allah.  In the social and political realm, he (pbuh) enjoined people to be just, a justice that extended to everyone in the society.  For example, when he (pbuh) told people to feed the poor, he (pbuh) did not mean feed only the poor Muslims (there were only 15 or so Muslims at that time in Makkah), he (pbuh) meant feed the hungry of humankind.  Islam came to eradicate injustice on all levels.  Justice is not discriminate; it is indiscriminate.  Muslims were champions of justice, wherever Muslims went, justice traveled with them.  Piety makes no sense if you are unjust, even if you are only unjust to animals.

Human life
Life is very central to a Muslim’s existence.  Under severe duress, a Muslim may be allowed to conceal his faith if he feels his life will be taken from him.  Allah gives life and only He has the right to decide when to take it.
It is through Allah’s universal lordship that we read in the Qur’an concepts like: Killing one person is like killing the whole of humanity; saving one person is like saving all of humanity (Surah al-Maidah).  The ayah, or verse, comes after narrating the story of Abel and Cain – the first two humans who encountered a violent struggle.  Abel – or Habeel – came out victorious – even though he died.  Cain – or Qabeel – came out as a proverbial villain – even though he survived.  According to Islamic principles, Abel was the first martyr on Earth.  But it wasn’t through warfare.
The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) said: If you defend yourself, protecting your life, and die, you are a martyr.  If you die defending life, honor, wealth and property, you die a martyr.  In these scenarios, there is a holy war or jihad – against oppression and injustice.  This is on an individual level.  The office of Jihad in Islam is nothing except an extension of this principle on a state level.
Critics of Islam say if Muhammad (pbuh) and his message deal with Allah’s universal lordship, how come he (pbuh) engaged in war? Isa – Jesus – (pbuh) did not attack others.  When the principle of Jihad is put into perspective, it is not too difficult to appreciate it.  But before the perspective, let’s have some background.
In the first 13 years of his mission, Muhammad (pbuh) had to overcome immense hurdles and social pressures.  13 years of struggle and persecution in Makkah brought him but fewer than a hundred followers.  Muslims had to migrate to another town called Madinah (Yathrib) in order to practice their faith.  This was a migration from death to life. The total number of Muslims in Madinah at the time of the first holy war in Islam (Badr) may have been around 500 at best.  313 of them participated in the battle.  Everyone else in Arabia was openly hostile and antagonistic towards the Muslims, even the Jewish tribes in Madinah.  For thirteen years, Muhammad (pbuh) was not given permission to defend himself.  It was in this context that permission for jihad was granted.  Muslims had no money, armor or resources and were being violently persecuted throughout this period. Jihad came, after 13 years of such persecution, as permission for the Muslims to defend themselves.  Jihad is a defense strategy.
Muslims do not need to apologize or deny the basis for jihad, but we do need to give it its proper perspective.  Jihad is assault based on defense, not on aggression.  Defense to uphold justice, not injustice.  It is all from the point of view of defense, even if it is a very aggressive campaign. If jihad were an offensive military strategy, rather than a defensive one, Muslims would never have spared so many lives, protected so much property or freed so many people during their campaigns.  It is important to realize that Muslims have ruled as a minority and this could not be possible if they were oppressive to the people they ruled over.  Besides, is this office of Jihad any different from what we call the Department of Defense – which actually engages in building a huge nuclear arsenal and fights wars overseas?
The rewards of death in jihad, or martyrdom, are there to motivate soldiers.  This is no different than what generals would say to their soldiers prior to a battle.  Muslims do not fight in jihad because we want to die, but fight in order to gain life or freedom from injustice.  The Prophet (pbuh) used to warn people not to pray for death in jihad.  Death is not something you yearn for.  Suicide has no place in Islam, it is an unforgivable sin that is almost as bad as shirk.
Lastly, it is important to remember that jihad has nothing to do with terrorism.  In fact, Islamic civilization was the first to compile laws against terrorism.  Terrorism is to take civilian life in non-war situations, no matter what your reason.  Even in war situations, Islam strongly condemns the loss of innocent (i.e. civilian) lives, euphemistically termed “collateral damage” in modern times.
Islamic governments were extremely anti-terror and that was why people were safe to travel everywhere.  You can even give zakat (a required form of charity for Muslims) to a traveler so he can return home, even if the traveler is rich in the country from which s/he came.  Muslims have always wanted safety and security in their countries.
In conclusion, against the backdrop of Allah’s universal lordship – which creates diversity – and through the perspective of the Prophet Muhammad’s (pbuh) mission to promote and maintain justice in all aspects of life, we must appreciate that Islam stands for a universal diversity which is established upon the principles of respecting life and justice for all.

[This article is a brief overview of a lecture given by Sheikh Mohammed Amin Kholwadia – Director of Darul Qasim  http://www.darulqasim.org ]


Wa'laykum Salam.

Sunday, 19 June 2011

Losing My Islam.


Al Salamu 'Alaykum.

Indian celebrities, Muslim faith

By Ekram Haque.

From time to time, we hear about some Muslim celebrities in India engaging in practices that is akin to compromising their faith. A recent case in point is news reports of cricketer Zaheer Khan worshiping in a temple. There are also several cases of young Muslim men and women marrying spouses from other faiths. This is a serious problem, and the Muslim celebrities in the sports and entertainment world as well as the Muslim youth must be reminded about the implications of their actions.
As is well known, the Muslim testimony of faith – “I testify that there is no god, except Allah” – begins with the negation of all deities and affirmation of Allah as the only God. Worshiping anyone else, whether for political correctness or expediency, breaks this covenant. The struggle of all prophets throughout history, including the Prophet Muhammad (S), was to invite people to the worship of one true God. In the pursuit of this goal, some of the prophets and their followers went through severe persecution, including expulsion from their homelands.
The very first pillar of a Muslim’s faith is to testify to Allah’s lordship with the tongue, believe in it in the heart, and manifest it through actions. Faith without action is meaningless, and action without faith is deficient. It is often the last part where people fall short the most.
The pagans of Makkah had pleaded with Prophet Muhammad (S) to worship their gods in return for them worshiping Allah. In response came a small chapter of the Qur’an completely rejecting any bartering of the faith:
“Say: O disbelievers, I worship not what you worship,
Nor will you worship what I worship,
Nor will you worship whom I worship,
And I shall not worship that you are worshipping,
Nor will you worship whom I worship,
To you, your religion, to me, mine.” Sura 109, verses 1-6
In another famous incident, some of the nobles of Makkah offered the Prophet Muhammad (S) the kingship and wealth of the Quraysh if he renounced his faith in one God. The Prophet response: I will not do that even if you gave me sun in one hand and moon in the other.
Islam acknowledges the existence of other faiths and encourages cooperation with them for the common good. The Prophet Muhammad (S) worked with the pagans of Makkah before his prophethood to maintain a treaty of common goodwill, known as Hilf ul Fudhul. Many years later as a Prophet he said that if he were to be invited to join such an endeavor again he would gladly do so.
While Muslims are encouraged to have good relations with people of other faiths, they are forbidden to worship anyone other than Allah. In Islam, there is no sin greater than associating partners with God. The Qur’an categorically states that while Allah can forgive all sins, there is no forgiveness for those who die on polytheism, called shirk in Arabic.
In all fairness, the celebrity world is a study in contrast. On the one hand we have seen some Muslim celebrities engaging in unislamic practices, at the same time we have witnessed several high-profile non-Muslim figures embracing Islam. Cases in point: Kamala Das, Maulana Umar Gautam, Malcolm X, Yvonne Ridley, Yusuf Islam (Cat Stevens), Imam Jamil Al-Amin (H. Rap Brown) and Kareem Abdul Jabbar. In fact, there are far more examples of the second kind. These celebrities found Islam to be the self-evident truth and liberator.
So for the Muslim celebrities who have worshipped in temples or taken spouses that Islamically are not allowed to them, it is time to take a fresh look at their priorities. It is possible that some celebrities and Muslim individuals in general may be put in a situation by the non-Muslim friends where they are expected to participate in their rituals. These Muslims may oblige with the intention to not hurt their sentiments. Instead, these celebrities should use wisdom and convey politely to their non-Muslim friends that they cannot participate in any ritual that is contradictory to their Islamic faith. They will not only earn the respect from their non-Muslim friends for adhering to his/her religious belief but also avoid such situations in the future.
These celebrities should learn from the great example of Caliph Umar (R). He was invited by the Christian leaders to directly negotiate the handover of Jerusalem to which he had agreed and entered Jerusalem in 637 AD on foot without any bloodshed or massacre. When it was time for prayer, the priests offered him the Church of the Holy Sepulcher to perform the prayer. Umar refused to pray in the Church, Had he done so, he explained, the Muslims would have wanted to build a mosque there to commemorate the first Islamic prayer in Jerusalem. So, he made it clear to the Christian priests without hurting their sentiments.
In conclusion, life and its pleasure are short-lived and temporary – for everyone. Someday, entertainment careers will end and sports prowess will wither away. The fans they care so much about will desert them. The only companion and helper that will remain with them is a faith they had not contaminated with disbelief.
Source: Two Circles.
'Alaykum Salam.

Friday, 17 June 2011

Ghulamon Ka Ghulam.

:salam: 
A fatwa by the Permanent Committee of Saudi Arabia states regarding keeping the name Ghulam Rasul:
 
Fatwa No. ( 479 )
Q: In brief, some one was granted Saudi nationality under his name, i.e. ghulamul-Rasul (lit. Servant of the Messenger). However, he does not feel comfortable with this name and wishes to change it unless it is permissible to be called as such.
A: Apparently, Ghulam according to the dialect of those who name their children as such means servant. Thus, Ghulamul-Rasul means Servant (worshipper) of the Messenger. It is well-known that names such as Abdul-Rahman (lit. Servant of the Merciful), Abdullah (lit. Servant of Allah) and the like symbolizes the servant's attachment to his Lord in the aspects of worship and submissiveness. Accordingly, a Muslim may not be called Servant of the Messenger, or the like, as it entails Shirk (associating others in worship with Allah). Therefore, the one seeking the fatwa must go to the proper authorities to change his name to a valid one.
May Allah grant us success! May peace and blessings be upon our Prophet Muhammad, his family and Companions!
Permanent Committee for Scholarly Research and Ifta.
 
This is an article related to the issue with some dala'il from the Qur'an and Sunna:
 
THE USE OF THE WORD ‘GHULAM’ AS A NAME AMONG THE MUSLIMS!
The word “Ghulam”1 is commonly used as a prefix to the name of a Prophet (e.g. Ghulam Muhammad or Ghulam Yahya) or Companion (e.g. Ghulam ‘Ali or Ghulam Husayn) or Scholar /Wali (e.g. Ghulam Ghauth or Ghulam ‘Arabi) among the Muslims.

There are some who say that such a name (e.g. Ghulam Mustafa or Ghulam ‘Ali) is indicative of ‘Shirk’ and that “Ghulam” indicates ‘abdiyat which is only for Allah. They believe that the word “’abd” and “Ghulam” are synonyms and mean the same thing.

In this short essay I intend to show that the word ghulaam appears both in the Qur’an and Hadith and also that the Noble Prophet (saws) himself has carefully differentiated between the term ‘abd and ghulaam allowing the Muslims to use the latter and stopping them from using the former.

The word “Ghulam” is originally an Arabic word, which can be found in the Qur’an as well as Hadith. It has been adopted from the Arabic into Urdu in the Indian subcontinent and is in common use here as well.

“GHULAAM IN THE QUR’AN”:
The word ‘Ghulaam’, its dual ‘Ghulaamayn’ and its plural ‘Ghilmaan’ all appear in the jeweled verses of the Qur’aan.

1] In Sura Yusuf verse 19, Allah says, “And there came some wayfarers and sent down one of them to go for water. So, he let down his bucket. He said, “What good news! Here is a boy.” (Qaala ya bushraa haadha ghulaam)

2] In Sura al Kahf, verse 74, Allah says, “So, they moved ahead until when they met a boy, he killed him (the boy).” (Hattaa idhaa laqiya ghulaaman faqatalahu) 2

3] In Sura al Kahf, verse 80, Allah says, “And as for the boy, his parents were believers.” (Wa ammal ghulaamu fakaana abwaahu...)

4] In Sura al Kahf, verse 82, Allah says, “And as for the wall, it belonged to two orphan boys in the city and there was beneath it a treasure for them, and their father was a pious man.” (Wa ammal jidaaru fakaana li ghulaamayni yateemayni fil madeenati…)

5] In Sura al Tur, verse 24, Allah says, “And they will be frequented by serving boys of their own, (neat and clean) as if they were hidden pearls.” (Wa yatufu ‘alayhim ghilmaanul lahum ka annahum lu’ lum maknoon)

All the English translations of the above-quoted verses are taken from Mufti Shafi’s Ma’arif al Qur’aan. 3
According to the ‘Vocabulary of the Holy Quran’ (Arabic-English) by ‘Abdullah ‘Abbas Nadwi and the Qamoos al Qur’aan (Arabic-Urdu) of Qadi Zain ul ‘Abideen Sajjad Meerathi4, the meaning of the word ‘ghulaam’ is as follows:

Ghulaam: a boy, young (n.)

Ghulaamayn: two boys (n. p.)

Ghilmaan: boys (n. p.)

“GHULAAM IN THE HADITH”:

1] In Mukhtasar Sahih al Bukhari (al Tajrid us Sarih) of ‘Allama Zubaydi, translated by Dr M Muhsin Khan, book 48, chapter 4, Hadith no 1143 we find:
Narrated (Qais): When Abu Huraira accompanied by his slave set out intending to embrace Islam they lost each other on the way. (Annahu lamma aqbala yureedul islaama wa ma’ahu ghulaamu…) The slave then came while Abu Huraira was sitting with the Prophet (saws). The Prophet (saws) said, “O Abu Huraira! Your slave has come back.” (Ya Aba Huraira, Haadha ghulaamuka qad ataak…) Abu Huraira said, “Indeed, I would like you to witness that I have manumitted him.” That happened at the time when Abu Huraira recited (the following poetic verse): -
‘What a long, tedious tiresome night!
Nevertheless, it has delivered us from the land of Kufr (disbelief).’

2] Book 48, chapter 7, Hadith 1147 of the same collection: Narrated Abu Huraira: “The Prophet (saws) said, “You should not say, ‘Feed your lord, help your lord in ablution, or give water to your lord,’ but should say, ‘My master (e.g. Feed your master instead of lord, etc.) (Saiyidi) or ‘My guardian’ (Maulai), and one should not say, ‘My slave (‘Abdi), or My slave-girl (‘Amati), but he should say ‘My lad (Fatai), ‘My lass (Fatati) and ‘My boy (Ghulaami).”

3] From Sahih Muslim, Kitab al alfaaz min al adab wa ghairiha, chapter 3, Hadith 2249, tr by A H Siddiqui:
Abu Huraira reported that Allah’s Messenger (saws) said: No one of you should say: My bondman and my slave-girl. All of you are the bondsmen of Allah, and all of your women are the slave-girls of Allah; but say: My servant, my girl, my young man and my young girl. (Wa la kinliya qool: ghulaami wa jaariyati, wa fataya wa fatayi)
It should be obvious from the above ahadith that the Holy Prophet (saws) did not mind calling slaves as Ghulaam and he allowed, rather he encouraged his Companions to also call them by the word Ghulaam in place of other words that could have been mistaken in meaning for Shirk.

Besides the above examples, the word ghulaam is also used in the Hadith for young boys who are not slaves:
3] Narrated Anas: A young Jewish boy used to serve the Prophet (saws) and he became sick. (Kaana ghulaamun yahudiyun yakhdumun nabiyy fa mareeda) So the Prophet (saws) went to visit him. He sat near his head and asked him to embrace Islam. The boy looked at his father who was sitting there; the latter told him to obey Abul Qasim (saws) and the boy embraced Islam. The Prophet (saws) came out saying, “All the praises and thanks be to Allah Who saved the boy from the Hell-fire.” (2:438 – Sahih al Bukhari)

4] Narrated ‘Umar ibn Abi Salama: I was a boy under the care of Allah’s Messenger (saws) (Kuntu ghulaaman fiy hajri rasoolillah….) and my hand used to go around the dish while eating. So Allah’s Messenger (saws) said to me, “O boy! (Ya ghulaam…) Mention the Name of Allah and eat with your right hand, and eat of the dish what is nearer to you.” Since then I have applied those instructions while eating. (7: 288 – Sahih al Bukhari)

Conclusion (Faayda):
From the Holy Qur’aan, it is obvious that the primary meaning of the word is that of a ‘young boy’. There is nothing in the Qur’aan to suggest that the word ‘Ghulaam’ has the same meaning as ‘abd’.
From the Hadith we find that the Holy Prophet (saws) and the Companions used various words for the slaves of that time such as ‘Abd, Ghulaam, Khadim, Fataya. Of these words the Holy Prophet (saws) has specifically stopped the Muslims from using the word ‘Abd for male slaves and ‘Amati for female slaves in the same manner in which he has ordered the slaves to stop calling their owners ‘Rabb’. In place of both terms the Holy Prophet (saws) has given acceptable terms for us to use. For a slave to a human being, the Prophet (saws) has clearly allowed the use of the word ‘ghulaam’, carefully differentiating it from the word ‘Abd. Therefore I do not think that the use of this word before the name of any Prophet or Companion or even any pious personality of the later generations can be counted as evidence of shirk or an act against the Shari’ah. And Allah knows Best.
1) I have used the words ghulam and ghulaam interchangeably. It is commonly spelt with a single ‘a’ although pronunciation wise it might preferably be spelt with two ‘a’s.
2) The tafsir of this ayah in Mufti Shafi’s Ma’arif al Qur’an might be very interesting for the reader particularly in relation to the topic at hand.
3) Ma’arif al Qur’an by Mufti Shafi Deobandi translated into English by Muhammad Shamim and corrected by Mufti Taqi Usmani.
4) Ustad of Tafsir at Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi, India.
 
Wa salam.

Tuesday, 31 May 2011

Lessons in Shirk: The Salat al Ghauthiyya.



Al Salamu 'Alaykum.

There are certain people who are very fond of an invented form of Salah (Namaz) called the Salat al Ghauthiyya or the Salat al Asrar.

Some salient points about this "Salah" are as follows:

It is specially offered in the month of Rabi' al Aakhir, probably because its proponents celebrate the 'Urs of Shaykh 'Abdil Qadir Gilani in this month. According to them, the prayer can be offered in other months as well.

According to them if one needs help and solutions for his problems then he should perform this 'prayer'.

The method is as follows:

After the Fard and Sunna of Maghrib, one is supposed to offer two rakahs of prayer.

In each rakah, after Sura Fatiha, the person is supposed to read Sura Ikhlas eleven times.

After Sura Ikhlas the person is supposed to read the following "dua":

<Ya Rasoola Allah hi Ya Nabi Allah hi Aghisni wa Amdidni Fi Qadi ai Hajati Ya Qadi al Hajaat>

After reading the above supplication to the Prophet (saws), the person is supposed to take eleven steps towards Iraq.

On every step, the person is supposed to supplicate to Shaykh 'Abdil Qadir Gilani in the following words:

<Ya Ghaus Saqalaini Ya Kareem-at-Tarfaini Aghisni was amdidni fi Qada-e-Hajati Ya Qaadi al Hajaat>

After this the person is supposed to make dua' using the wasila of Rasulullah (saws). The proponents of this prayer say that all needs will then be fulfilled.

May Allah guide all Muslims to Tawhid and Sunna and save them from Shirk and Bida'.

'Alaykum salam.